Warning: there will be SPOILERS
After an earthquake opens up an underground chamber, ancient piranha that survived for 2 million years trapped in an underground lake are freed and begin attacking stupid, horny, drunk Spring Breakers despite the best efforts of the local sheriff Julie Forester (Elisabeth Shue, Cocktail), a geologist (Adam Scott, Knocked Up), and her deputies (including Ving Rhames, Out of Sight) to warn them. At the same time, the sheriff’s square (but Pixies/Lou Reed/Ramones merch owning, so we know he’s really cooler than those obnoxious kids) son Jake (Steven R. McQueen, grandson of Steve McQueen, star of The Vampire Diaries) is out on the water with sleazy Girls Gone Wild-style soft core porn magnate Derrick Jones (Jerry O’Connell, Mission to Mars). Jake got the job because Wild Girl Danni (pin-up Kelly Brook) met him while randomly talking to Jake’s “sassy”, trombone playing, preteen sister (Brooklyn Proulx, Brokeback Mountain). Along with Danni, Jake and mega-asshole Derrick are another Wild Girl (porn star Riley Steele) and the girl Jake is mooning over, Kelly (Jessica Szohr, Gossip Girl), who invites herself, seemingly because she has nothing better to do than ensure that Jake hypocritically protects her “honor” from the very people he’d love to lose his with. Can Julie get to Jake (and, through a series of ludicrous events, her two youngest children) before the piranha can? Does the audience even care?
There are a few main criticisms directed at the horror films of the last ten years or so. One is that “PG-13” horror is killing the genre, another is that the R rated films we are getting are “torture porn”, and the last is that the endless remakes are insulting both to audiences and the original films themselves. Piranha 3D is a film that doesn’t quite fit into the “torture porn” sub-genre (though it is as mean-spirited and gory as they are), is a remake, and caters to the horror audience that feels what’s really missing from horror are the old exploitation standbys of nudity and gore, and, indeed, many reviews read “well, Piranha 3D is a rote Jaws knock-off, there are no characters, suspense, or tension to speak of, but man, they sure did pack in an unbelievable amount of blood and boobs into it, in 3D, no less.”
While enjoyment of a film is in the eye of the beholder, and a big, tasteless collection of 3D nudity, near-nudity, and violent, gory death by lousy CG and uncomfortable cameos by Richard Dreyfus (reprising his role as Matt Hooper from Jaws no less), and Christopher Lloyd (Clue), are all you wanted, the film delivers. If you wanted to care in any way about anyone in the film, wanted to avoid boredom while watching it, or if you wanted some actual humor (free from near toxic levels of hypocritical mean spirit, as a bonus), you will be disappointed. By the time the big “Spring Breakers ignore warnings and die at the hands of piranha schools” scene (complete with a typically loathsome cameo from Eli “Quentin Tarantino’s less talented, restrained and attractive brother” Roth (Cabin Fever) and the bulk of the gore the film delivers) ends I was ready to leave the theater to avoid sitting through the anti-climatic rescue of the sheriff’s children from Derrick’s sinking boat.
If only I had, as this sequence is just as uninspired as the rest of the film. Especially disappointing was how Adam Scott’s geologist, arguably the only character that showed any spark of life-more from Scott’s performance than from anything found in the script-gets killed in the film’s ludicrous “It’s Not Over” moment. Kelly Brook’s Danni, who is arguably a better, more honest person than Jake’s crush Kelly, gets killed for no reason other than the fact that she “acts” in cheesy nudity videos. Let’s go down the checklist: unlike Kelly she is always nice to Jake, she’s nice to Jake’s kid siblings, she gets Jake a job, she never gets herself menaced, she’s not whiny, she doesn’t hang out with guys who throw slushies at Jake, she doesn’t get too drunk and throw up, she doesn’t go on a ship to cock-block a guy who she’s been keeping hanging for an unspecified length of time. Kelly, however, gets a heroic rescue, while Danni gets eaten by piranha as a distraction to save the rest of the family. This, and Ving Rhames absolutely brain-damaged “last stand” against the piranha, makes the film feel like a throw back to the worst of the old horror “rules”-anyone who does anything sexual has to die, the black guy has to die, and so on-but with an even more hypocritical edge on the film. What’s worse is that the traditional “heroes come up with a plan to destroy the creatures” is replaced by “heroes fail to do anything but kill a few fish”. Maybe this would work if it was played right, but here it just feels like a lazy refusal to come up with an ending.
What’s wrong with PG-13 horror films is the same thing that’s wrong with this one. The problem is not that they lack nudity or gore, it is that they lack anyone talented enough, or who cares enough, to create any more than the absolute lowest requirements of the sub-genre. William Castle, Curt Sidomak, and Roger Corman did far more with even more restrictive rules than the PG-13 horror films face, and this film, which is as unrestricted as a general release can get, manages to do nothing with that freedom beyond a few gross-out gags and a lot of nudity than you can find abundantly online for free, in several cases from the same actresses that provide it there. The mean-spirited, hypocritical vibe of the film’s humor, which seems to hate the prospective audience rather than embrace it is an insult to the original film, which masterfully balanced black comedy and the expected elements of an R-rated Jaws knock-off. Of course, that film was directed by Joe Dante and written by John Sayles, and this film is directed by Alexandre Aja, known for bad remakes and bad twists, and written by Josh Stolberg and Pete Goldfinger, the writers of, I never thought I’d write this, the superior (to this film, anyhow) Sorority Row, which sported a similar mean-spirited, “kids are assholes” vibe. How telling is it that in the 1970s the heroes are up against the military-industrial complex to warn campers and vacationers and in this one kids don’t listen to the authorities when a natural disaster strikes? In the 2010s, we blame the victims.
You’ve articulate all of this to me via other venues previously, but this is a phenomenal review.
Thank you, sir.
Your review is great, but I’d like some more description of the boobs that you mentioned. Are they any good?
I advise simply doing a Google image searches for Riley Steele, Gianna Michaels and Kelly Brook. You’ll see everything you missed in the film, though you may want to not do this at work.
As far as the big sequence, a 3D underwater bit with Steele and Brook swimming nude while a camera moves around them, well, underwater photography is not kind to implants and the whole thing looked pretty fake-not sure if it was digitally altered or even really shot underwater. There is certainly a lot of flesh on display.
While I can’t argue over your opinion of a film I haven’t seen–in spite of the fact I think I’d probably enoy it more than you did–I think it is worth pointing out that–and this could be an excellent discussion in and of itself: horror movies often delight in killing off the more sympathetic characters and letting the ones we hate/like less live.
Danni’s death sounds a lot like what happened to the nicest member of the group of teens in Jaws 2, for instance. And even in the original Piranha, Belinda Balaski is the more sympathetic of the two camp counselors and she ends up as fish food.
I think the question, then, becomes: when does that stop being effectively horrifying and become just plain annoying? I know one of the reasons I disliked Deep Star Six is because the two characters I actually liked ended up as lobster chow, leaving us with the completely unengaging leads.
On a slightly related note, your description of Kelly makes me realize how sad it is that the only movie I can think of that dares to kill off the “hot girl who hangs around with the jerks who beat up the kinda dweeby guy” love interest was Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem. And I hate having to give that movie any credit.
I see what you’re saying, but I don’t think we’re supposed to find Danni more sympathetic. Generally when that happens we are clearly SUPPOSED to feel bad that the person died (Balaski’s counselor, is an excellent example, though I’d argue that both are very sympathetic). Here I think we are supposed to enjoy her death while the director and Eli Roth giggle to themselves in the background while muttering “Hee hee whores whores whores violent death whores.” There’s no indication that it’s a bad thing that she dies, indeed, not even slight lingering over it.
I did kind of figure that that was the other possibility. Which, I agree, is far more to the “that’s just Goddamn annoying” side of the equation. It would be nice to see an exploitation film that didn’t take such a negative attitude towards sex.
Some of Roger Corman’s work could be described that way, of course–in Forbidden World Dawn Dunlap’s character has multiple full-frontal nude scenes and puts the moves on the hero mere hours after her boyfriend was killed, yet is never “punished”; in The Nest the heroine comes back into the hero’s life after many years and sleeps with him, despite knowing he’s involved with someone else, and is also not “punished”–but it really is kind of ridiculous.
I realize such attitudes caught on because it was the laziest way to combine nudity and gore, but you’d think by now filmmakers could be a little more creative.
I think it goes beyond laziness, but maybe that’s just me, I wasn’t there and don’t know the director personally. I haven’t seen any other films by Aja, but Eli Roth seems to love sex=death and even wrote a “Top Ten Genital Mutilation Scenes” list, so I find his presence in anything suspect. I really dislike him.