August 19th, 2014: Blacula (1972)

Cast and Crew:  Samuel Z. Arkoff (Producer); The Hues Corporation (Soundtrack); Denise Nicholas, Ji-Tu Cumbuka, Elisha Cook Jr.

What It’s About: Manuwalde (William Marshall) is an African prince who wants to end slavery, a noble goal.  Unfortunately, his method of accomplishing his goal needs a bit of work.  Not only does he think that he’ll get somewhere by politely asking Europeans to simply stop capturing his people and selling them abroad, but he goes to Transylvania to do it (which might be a good place to get help if the slavery he was attempting to stop involved the Ottoman Empire, but not so much for the Trans-Atlantic slave trade), and somehow ends up at the castle of Count Dracula (Charles Macaulay).  To Manuwalde’s great  misfortune, Dracula is not only a vampire, but an extremely racist one.  After attempting to buy Manuwalde’s lovely wife Luva (Vonetta McGee), he transforms Manuwalde into a vampire and locks him in a coffin, walling up Luva in the room with him.  Dracula curses Manuwalde to become…wait for it…BLACULA!, a name you will get used to hearing shouted in William Marshall’s amazing voice.

After horribly stereotypical gay interior designers unearth his coffin and ship it to L.A. during a Transylvanian antiquing expedition, Blacula nee Manuwalde escapes and begins slaking his thirst-and having confusing encounters with the modern world.  Forensic expert Gordon Thomas (Thalmus Rasulala) is on Blacula’s trail.  Thomas numbers among his friends not only one of the interior designers, but also Tina (Vonetta McGee again) and before you can say “reincarnation of long-lost love” Blacula is playing Dracula to Tina’s Mina and Thomas’s Van Helsing (Tina is unattached, so there is no Jonathan Harker to deal with).  Can Thomas stop Blacula before it’s too late?  Can Blacula find a way to escape Dracula’s curse and be with Tina?  Just how many helmeted L.A. cops will Blacula kill before it’s all over?

Why Watch it Today?:  William Marshall was born 90 years ago today in 1924.  Marshall acted on stage, screen, and television, but sadly the best showcase of his talents on film was Blacula.  Marshall makes every scene he’s in quite enjoyable (and McGee and Rasulala are nearly as good as Marshall) but the film is too lazy and uneven to really qualify as a good updating of the basic Dracula tale, especially when the filmmakers stray too far into camp or allow the fact that they don’t really care to show a bit too much.  When Marshall is giving his all, the film really works, and it’s worth seeing Blacula just to see Marshall’s performance.

Other Choices:  Marshall also stars in Abby, where he gets shunted off into the Van Helsing/exorcist role and doesn’t get quite as much time on the screen, though he does get an astoundingly large cross in the opening as a gift (to which my friend infamously quipped “BLING FOR BLACCCCULLLAAAAA!!!!!”).

6 comments on “August 19th, 2014: Blacula (1972)

  1. […] it needed to drastically change the series if it expected to survive, and, anticipating films like Blacula which would move Dracula to the modern-day, decided what was needed was to set the film like, now […]

  2. geelw says:

    Ha! I saw this at the movies when I was eight years old (thanks, mom!) and on TV plenty of times afterwards. It was and still is a damn hoot of a bad movie. I actually liked Marshall in that Star Trek episode The Ultimate Computer, where he delivers a great and amusing monologue before Mr. Spock puts the Vulcan Death Drip on him and walks him off the set. THAT scene was hilarious because Marshall was taller than Nimoy and he had to bend down a bit so he could be taken away….

    • T.A. Gerolami says:

      Need to see that episode; I didn’t see this until college while I saw the majority of my TOS episodes before that (I’ve seen a smattering since and am always amazed at all the actors I now know). Have to look for that one.

      I find this to be a frustrating movie in a lot of ways. The parts where they bother to try are actually pretty good thanks to the great cast, but there is so much not trying and goofiness that it feels like two movies to me. There’s the crazy funky urban horror movie and then there’s the (actually pretty good) tragic horror romance of Manuwalde and his reincarnated lost love.

      • geelw says:

        Yeah, the inconsistency bugs me as well. It’s as if the studio couldn’t trust the intended audience to sit still for a decent dramatic horror flick (well, save for that Blacula makeup! Those double sideburns and widow’s peak made me laugh too much), so they went the old school “shuck & jive” route with the humor. I do recall the audience eating it up back then because it was the first time we saw a black “Dracula” in a movie. On the other hand, “Blackenstein” was a total waste of time (and just flat out dumb to my eyes)…

      • T.A. Gerolami says:

        Yeah, the make-up is pretty hard to take seriously, and you have to wonder how they arrived at it, though there are, of course, some legends where vampires have extra facial hair.

        There are few movies as boringly terrible as Blackenstein. I recall Freeman William’s old site The Bad Movie Report reviewing it-and warning against seeing it-and my own brother told me not to bother, but I didn’t listen. Best I can say is at least I didn’t inflict it on anyone else. Or pay a theater price to see it! Think I saw it on a VHS tape bought from a store going out of business.

  3. […] August 19th, 2014: Blacula (1972) […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s